When it comes to smartwatches, Amazfit is a brand that stands out. Today, we’ll compare two of their popular models: the Amazfit Balance and the Amazfit Cheetah Pro.<\/p>\n
The Amazfit Balance boasts a sleek design with dimensions of 46x46x10.6mm and weighs just 35g without the strap. It’s available in Sunset Grey and Midnight colors. On the other hand, the Cheetah Pro has a slightly larger dimension of 47x47x11.8mm and weighs 43 grams. Both watches have a circular design, but the Balance has a slight edge in terms of weight and build materials.<\/p>\n
Both watches feature an AMOLED display. The Balance has a 1.5″ screen with a resolution of 480×480 and a pixel density of 323 PPI. The Cheetah Pro, while having the same resolution, comes with a slightly smaller 1.43″ screen. Both displays are sharp, but the Balance offers a slightly larger viewing area.<\/p>\n
The Balance, however, offers a more comprehensive range of sensors, including a BioTracker\u2122 5.0 PPG biometric sensor and a BIA Bioelectric Impedance Sensor. Both watches support Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity.<\/p>\n
The Amazfit Balance is feature-rich, offering voice assistants like Amazon Alexa, music storage, and a plethora of sports and health features. It supports over 150 sports modes, from running to dancing. The Cheetah Pro, while offering essential features like text message notifications, music control, and activity tracking, doesn’t match the extensive list of the Balance.<\/p>\n
While both watches are impressive in their own right, the Amazfit Balance seems to have an edge in terms of design, display size, and features.<\/p>\n
The Cheetah Pro is a solid choice for those looking for essential smartwatch features without the added extras. Choose the Balance if you want a more comprehensive health and fitness companion, and the Cheetah Pro for a simpler, straightforward experience.<\/p>\n
Here you can check the side by side comparison of Amazfit Balance and Amazfit Cheetah Pro.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11727,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/aps-comparisons\/11726"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/aps-comparisons"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/aps-comparisons"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11726"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartwatchspace.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}